A Kauffman Foundation site

Policy Forum Blog

The Policy Dialogue on Entrepreneurship Informs and connects thought leaders looking to understand policies that help entrepreneurs start companies, create jobs and re-start the economy.
Sign up to receive our weekly update!

RSS Feed Link

Summit & Site Explore 'Expeditionary Economics'

Posted by: Mark Marich on June 21, 2010 Source: Policy Dialogue on Entrepreneurship

Rather than repeat futile efforts of pouring money and military force into these devastated economies, the concept of entrepreneurship driving economic growth and stability in war-torn and otherwise distressed nations is one that has been the subject of much discussion lately. A recent Foreign Affairs article by the Kauffman Foundation's Carl Schramm argues that Washington's typical paternalistic approach is flawed and that instead it should emphasize "a US-style entrepreneurship along with a U.S. military effort" to catalyze new wealth, new jobs, and, ultimately, a reformed economy focused on growth and social stability.

Expeditionary economics, as well as insights from some of the foremost thinkers in military history, foreign policy, and economic growth were discussed at the Summit on Entrepreneurship and Expeditionary Economics on May 25 – 27, 2010, co-hosted by the Kauffman Foundation and the Command and General Staff College Foundation. Summit dialogue ranged from an historical overview of post-conflict economic engagement from the Marshall Plan through more recent conflict the Balkans to a frank assessment of the ongoing development efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan and the lessons they imparted.
 
Overviews of the discussion can be accessed here:
For additional resources about expeditionary economics and discussions from the summit, visit the Kauffman Foundation's newly launched website, Entrepreneurship and Expeditionary Economics

Tags:  kauffman foundation

1 Comments

Re: Summit and Site Explore Expeditionary Economics
August 01, 2010 @ 12:00 AM
Keynote Speaker said...
This has been something that has been neglected since WWII. Despite their communist economy, the Russians were much better at post-war diplomatic relations around the world. We saw it as an opportunity for appointing friends to be diplomats and just throwing money at the country's issues, the USSR saw it as an opportunity for development and creating ties. Obviously, the Russians biggest issue was that they couldn't sustain their own economy, but their foreign relations were still an improvement over ours.

Charlie Wilson said it best, "we won the war and then we [screwed] up the end-game."

Add a Comment

Search PDE

Policy Dialogue on Entrepreneurship Get Your Weekly Digest

Register today to receive news and updates from Entrepreneurship.org.

Email Newsletter Signup