A Kauffman Foundation site

RSS Feed Link

Helping the World's Future Entrepreneurs

Posted by: Jonathan Ortmans on September 13, 2011 Source: Policy Dialogue on Entrepreneurship

Over time I have become increasingly confused as to the meaning of “youth entrepreneurship.” Here in the United States, invariably, the Small Business Administration adheres to the same definition as youth entrepreneurship advocates such as DECA and NFTE who serve high school age Americans and even younger. However, the World Bank and other multinational development organizations appear to be referring to anyone under the age of 40. Further still, private sector global entrepreneurship charities such as the respected Prince’s Youth Business International (YBI)—Prince Charles’s charity—narrow it to between 18 and 35. While the myth of entrepreneurs as “modern day Mozarts” in garages (to borrow Carl Schramm’s phrase) is slowly being dispelled, it seems our human instinct to avoid conversations about age is alive and well!

The reason this matters now is because governments and non-governmental organizations around the globe appear to be ramping up investment in “youth enterprise.”

Last week I was a speaker at the Global Youth Economic Opportunities Conference hosted by Making Cents International in Washington, DC. Since 2007, the conference has provided an excellent learning platform for professionals working to expand economic opportunities for young people. If you check out the list of 400+ participants—mostly people managing programs—from over 60 countries, you will get an idea of this large and growing international youth entrepreneurship movement. The conference demonstrated there is a lot happening. For example, on the government side, USAID outlined a new youth strategy and shared its experiences and future plans for increased overall funding in youth entrepreneurship to breed hope among the youth. Examples included conflict-ridden Gaza, and Kosovo where USAID designed a three year Young Entrepreneurs Project (YEP) to support young people (in this case, ages 18-35) to develop viable businesses by providing matching grants, coaching, and mentoring for fledgling young entrepreneurs.

The private sector, too, is brimming with its own youth entrepreneurship organizations. The recent formation of the Young Entrepreneurs Alliance which meets around the G20 is evidence of an increase in activity. Making Cents International and YBI are doing an excellent job of mapping the emerging field not only through efforts like YBI’s development of a working group within the Aspen Network for Development Entrepreneurs (ANDE), but also through publishing regular reports on trends and programs—the latest of which was released last week entitled, ‘Closing the Gap’—part of a Making Entrepreneurship Work series. The report does an excellent job of showing the importance of non-financial support such as training and mentoring in reducing the risk of lending and substituting for collateral and other types of guarantee. What the report’s case studies also illustrate is that youth entrepreneurship programs have many allies and supporters around the world and are flourishing. For example:

  • The Centennial Fund (TCF) and Saudi Credit & Savings Bank (SCSB) partner to expand business start-up opportunities for youth in Saudi Arabia.
  • The Canadian Youth Business Foundation (CYBF) partners with the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) to increase access to finance for young entrepreneurs.
  • Government guarantees in India enable an increase in access to capital for young entrepreneurs through public-private lending partnerships between Bharatiya Yuva Shakti Trust (BYST) and Bank of Baroda and Indian Bank.
  • In Israel, Keren Shemesh partners with Koret and Otsar Ha-Hayal Bank to serve young entrepreneurs.
  • The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) monetises non-financial support to scale youth entrepreneurship initiatives in Argentina, Colombia and Mexico.
  • TechnoServe has developed financing partnerships to expand its business plan competition in Central America and the Andean regions for hard-to-serve youth entrepreneurs.
  • Silatech partners with Al-Amal Microfinance Bank in Yemen to give young entrepreneurs their first opportunity to access formal finance.

Such reports and youth entrepreneurship conferences though seem to tell only part of the story even though it is being written by so many young people. For example, Startup Weekend, Seedcamp, Y Combinator and the like help young entrepreneurs start new firms but they are not considered youth entrepreneurship groups.

I am not discouraging broadly weighting investment in favor of younger generations. Beyond it being smart economics, it is of course the right thing for any society to do to nurture its young—especially during times of historically high levels of youth unemployment. And this after all is one premise behind Global Entrepreneurship Week which is guiding millions of younger people to consider launching a firm sometime in their career. However, I am suggesting that we need to be more precise in our thinking. If “youth” means anywhere from ages 8 – 40, it hardly seems the right criteria through which to target our programming if we are to develop a sound analysis as to what works in helping indigenous peoples create growth firms that build their economies, solve problems and create jobs.

As always, comments welcome.

3 Comments

RE: Helping the Worlds Future Entrepreneurs
September 13, 2011 @ 12:11 PM
David Britton said...
Age is not a measure of anything when it comes to entrepreneurship. I am now 74 and am starting a new Manufacturing/services firm with my LLC member/partner who is 56. We are building something in The Additive Manufacturing industry, that never existed 5 years ago! I have created 2 public companies and 2 others that were high tech startups.

I specialize in solving impossible problems and create great opportunities for community growth, regardless of my age. What a waste to leave everything to youth, since we tried that once before in Silicon Valley with limited results.
RE: Helping the Worlds Future Entrepreneurs
September 13, 2011 @ 12:35 PM
Mark said...
Jonathan's comments about youth entrepreneurship make sense. At the same time, they are reflective of a larger policy issue around entrepreneurship in general. There clearly are different kinds of "entrepreneurs," people who work independently as consultants, people whose lifestyle is built around small businesses, entrepreneurial actors in large organizations, social innovators, and people who start high growth businesses. The needs and policy issues associated with each group are very different, just as with different ages of youth.

The issue seems to be one of the policy making process. For example, in a time with a major need for job growth, entrepreneurs get a lot of attention because they (one small class of them) create most or all of the net new jobs in developed economies. Unfortunately, most policy makers will then go on to create programs and support for what they consider to be "entrepreneurs," without ever really evaluating what small class of entrepreneurs are the real job creators and what are their unique needs. The disconnect comes from oversimplifying the solution in reaction to a critical situation.

In developed economies, there is strong research that only the high growth entrepreneurs make an outsized contribution to macro job growth and so deserve very special treatment. Yet, the majority of government programs probably devote more resources to the other categories of entrepreneurs--those with dramatically less macro economic impact. Is this wrong? Probably not in a black and white sense. There is value in helping every class of entrepreneur. Nevertheless, in a time of constrained resources, it is not a very efficient or effective way to make policy that maximizes the overall social gain for the given investment, and balances short and long term objectives. But the nuances of different kinds of entrepreneurs and needs are easily lost in a rancorous political environment that just has no time or energy or even interest for nuance.

One can make a case for supporting youth entrepreneurship at all of the age levels mentioned by Jonathan. Frankly, the biggest need for business in general today is for leaders who can nurture and support innovation. For the very long term, there is probably no greater way to address this problem than to teach entrepreneurial thinking and innovation to all high school students. This is one policy area. (Unfortunately, most high school programs teach how to start small businesses, not how to innovate, so their impact is limited.) At the same time, the best way to get shorter term job gains is to support young people of college age and beyond who have great potential to start high growth businesses, as do efforts such as Y Combinator. This requires very different responses to very different needs. The best answer, of course, is some type of balance that considers the different impacts and needs of each group and balances investment and support in a manner that makes good sense. This seems to be what Jonathan is calling for, and I support him 100%. But how do we get the policy making process off of responding to labels like "entrepreneurship" or "youth entrepreneurship" and instead carefully considering different needs and impacts? The only way I know is to stimulate grass roots initiatives of the kind that are needed, and for all those who recognize the issue to spend more time educating policy makers who, in most cases, probably have no idea that the program labels they are supporting might not deal with the most pressing issues and are not part of the most effective balance.

RE: Helping the Worlds Future Entrepreneurs
September 13, 2011 @ 02:46 PM
G Dale Meyer said...
I am interested in research findings about the age distribution of people who create startup SMEs and where such data might exist? In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region the under 30 populations are 60 to 70 percent of total country populations. Does it make any sense to focus on the 18-30 age group through training to create SMEs as one way to employ this group? Why or why not? The United States underemployment or unemployment rate for college graduates from 2008-present is yet to be labeled a "crisis" - but will this soon be named as one of our major economic problems? USAID has sent a functionary to Egypt with a US $137 million budget to foster employment of the 18-30 age group through entrepreneurship training. Why and will this yet to be spent US money do any economic good? How will the cost-benefit be measured, if at all? Nevertheless, should we simply "diss" employment- through-startups without looking into available data on the relationship between age group founders and jobs created over a given time period. The Western Partners Worldwide Foundation's intense six-week, no-fluff workshops Concept-to-Startup-and Beyond measures actual creation of businesses and long-term followup tracking. Silatech in Doha, Qatar is considering financial support for these workshops combined with a "train-the-trainers" program for indigene business owners and academics to implement the workshops. In the meantime, Western academic and consulting "bandits" are arriving in droves to "solve" the youth unemployment crisis in the MENA region.

Add a Comment

Search PDE

Policy Dialogue on Entrepreneurship Get Your Weekly Digest

Register today to receive news and updates from Entrepreneurship.org.

Email Newsletter Signup